-

-

Istoria Regimentului al II-lea român de graniţă, cu statul major la Năsăud (1763–1851), din cadrul structurilor militare imperiale austriece, este cunoscută, atât ca urmare a rolului avut în unele evenimente istorice care i-au definit existenţa, cât şi datorită studiilor şi scrierilor istoriografice, mai vechi sau de dată mai recentă. Mult mai puţine date au fost publicate despre Batalionul I Grăniceresc de Gardă (1933–1940) – destinat, inițial, pentru a fi cantonat în Năsăud, dar instalat efectiv în garnizoana Bistriţa – înfiinţat de regele Carol al II-lea, menit a fi continuatorul vechiului regiment năsăudean, şi care a avut ca areal geografic de recrutare locuitorii din fostele comune grănicereşti. Tocmai de aceea, lucrarea de faţă îşi propune să ofere cititorilor un corpus documentar privitor la acest batalion prin publicarea sau reluarea unor materiale scrise, provenite din mai multe surse: Serviciul Judeţean Bistriţa-Năsăud al Arhivelor Naţionale, Muzeul Grăniceresc Năsăudean, Arhivele Militare Piteşti, presa vremii, însemnări memorialistice etc. (Editorii)

 

CONTENTS


Vorwort

Ondřej CHVOJKA
Chronologie und Kulturen der südböhmischen Bronzezeit und ihre Parallelisierung zu den Donaugebieten und Karpatenbecken

Viktória KISS–Szilvia FÁBIÁN–Tamás HAJDU–Kitti KÖHLER–Gabriella KULCSÁR–István MAJOR–Géza SZABÓ
Contributions to the Relative and Absolute Chronology of the Early and Middle Bronze Age in Western Hungary Based on Radiocarbon Dating of Human Bones

Marija LJUŠTINA–Katarina DMITROVIĆ
Core vs. Periphery: Some Stratigraphical and Chronological Remarks on the Vatin Culture in Banat and Western Serbia

Katarina DMITROVIĆ–Marija LJUŠTINA
Metal Finds as Indicators of Relations Between the Middle Bronze Age Cultures on Western and Northern Serbia

Florin GOGÂLTAN
The Early and Middle Bronze Age Chronology on the Eastern Frontier of the Carpathian Basin. Revisited after 15 Years

József PUSKÁS
Contact Zone: Middle Bronze Age Cultural Connections in the Valley of the Black River (Covasna County, Romania)

Neculai BOLOHAN–Alexandru GAFINCU–Iulian STOLERIU
Middle Bronze Age Chronology East of the Carpathian Area. A Bayesian Model

Horia CIUGUDEAN–Colin P. QUINN
The End of the Wietenberg Culture in the Light of new 14C Dates and its Chronological Relation Towards the Noua Culture

Rita E. NÉMETH
The Middle Bronze Age “Mass Grave” from Voivodeni–La Şcoală. A Chronological Approach

Tibor-Tamás DARÓCZI–Adrian URSUŢIU
Contextualising Decorations. A Study of Placement and Context of Ornaments on Bronze Age Ceramics from the Lower Feneş Valley

Gábor ILON
Zeitstellung der Urnenfelderkultur (1350/1300–750/700 BC) in West-Transdanubien. Ein Versuch mittels Typochronologie und Radiokarbondaten

Attila László
Über die Chronologie des kulturellen Wechsels zwischen der Noua-Coslogeni Kultur und der Nachfolger- Kulturen mit kannelierter und mit ritz- und stempelverzierter Keramik in den innen- und aussenkarpatischen Gebieten. Einige Lehren der Radiokarbondatierungen

János Gábor TARBAY
The Reanalysis of the Eponymous Hoard from Gyermely-Szomor and the HaA2 Period in the Territory of Hungary

Tiberius BADER
Zur Chronologie Der Lanzenspitzen im Karpaten-Donau-Raum

Abbreviations

Țara Năsăudului este una dintre micro-regiunile României care s-a bucurat de o atenţie ştiinţifică aparte, nu doar din partea istoricilor, ci dinspre întregul spectru al ştiinţelor umaniste şi sociale. Bibliografiile istorice ale României au acumulat, volum de volum, numeroase titluri dedicate temei: fie cărţi, fie studii şi articole provenite atât din periodice ştiinţifice locale, cât şi din principalele reviste de istorie din centrele universitare sau din diverse volume de studii. Această valoroasă literatură ştiinţifică a devenit în timp tot mai amplă, solicitând cercetătorilor, şi mai ales cercetătorilor debutanţi, un efort consistent de documentare bibliografică.

Organizarea şi activitatea Regimentului 17 (2 românesc) de graniţă pe teritoriul năsăudean au legat acest spaţiu de ansamblul istoriei Monarhiei habsburgice într-un mod mai intim şi pe alocuri chiar mai spectaculos decât alte regiuni locuite de români. (din „Introducere”)

Romanian nationalism has been and it still is a research topic that has generated and still generates various controversies, both at the level of the opinions of the authors who have dealt with this subject, and at the level of the interpretations that the reader can have on such a topic. And the analysis of the evolution of Romanian nationalism since 1989 is a theme that can be included in this framework of different, and sometimes even contradictory, approaches. Moreover, any analysis of post-communist Romanian nationalism may have its limitations, in terms of the authors’ approaches, and because, in general, approaches to nationalism have a certain potential for inaccuracy. The nationalist phenomenon is very complex because it refers to the people (the nation) and the country and quite often the boundary between nationalism and patriotism, for example, is quite weak. And in the Romanian case, things were even more complicated, both because the nationalism responded to a need for homogeneity existing in the post-communist Romanian society, and because the Romanian nationalism had a specific and quite complex typology.

In this paper, we referred more to those aspects that looked at the presence of nationalism in areas such as society, culture, religion or interethnic relations. Moreover, the period chosen for the study was rather a delicate one, considering the fact that the last decade of the twentieth century was, for Romania, a period of search of the road that the country needed to straighten, after half a century of totalitarian regime. And studying nationalism in such a historical context may have different interpretations, especially since post-communist Romanian nationalism, as some Romanian authors have stated, could be considered as paradigmatic for nationalism in general, because of its subtlety and complexity. (from the „Introduction”)