„This volume was published within the framework of LIMES National Reserch Programe, sup‑ported by the Romanian Ministry of Culture and National Identity. Therefore we would like to thank our friends and colleagues Ovidiu Țentea and Felix Marcu for their support in publishing this work. Special thanks go to: Constantin Băjenaru (MINAC); Sebastian Corneanu (Lucian Blaga University in Sibiu); Mihai Duca (Bucharest); + Arch. Cătălin Georgescu (Bucharest); Iulia Iliescu (University of Bucharest); Marian Mocanu (ICEM, Tulcea); Andrei Opaiț (Toronto); Dorel Paraschiv (ICEM, Tulcea); Prof. Constantin C. Petolescu (Bucharest); Mihai Popescu (CNRS, Paris); Raluca Popescu (Muzeul Municipiului București, Bucharest); Tiberiu Potârniche (MINAC); Arch. Anișoara Sion (Bucharest); Gabriel Stoian (Bucharest); Valeriu Toma (Bucharest); Mihai Vasile (MNIR Bucharest); Dan Vasilescu (MINAC); Florica Zaharia (former Conservator in Charge of the Department of Textile Conservation, The Metropolitan Museum of Art). For the topographic measurements, we owe thanks to Mihai Florea (MNIR Bucharest); some of the draw‑ings have been made by Jeni Efimov (ICEM, Tulcea), Cătălina Petolescu (Bucharest) and Ingrid Petcu (MINAC).” (from Acknowledgments)

„Ce second supplément des Inscriptiones Daciae Romanae représente, tout comme le premier, une préparation à la publication des fascicules du quatrième volume des IDR, contenant les inscriptions de Dacie Porolissensis. Il comprend la grande majorité des estampilles sur briques et tuiles du Musée National d’Histoire de Transylvanie de Cluj-Napoca. Malheureusement, pour des raisons techniques, nous n’avons pas eu accès aux pièces prêtées en 1971 au Musée National d’Histoire de Roumanie de Bucarest, lors de la constitution de celui-ci1. Au fil de plusieurs années Mme Viorica Rusu Bolindeț avait apporté dans le dépôt du musée des dizaines de tuiles estampillées du prétoire du consulaire d’Apulum, mais on n’a pas pu agréer aucune solution afin de citer son manuscrit. Du point de vue scientifique la perte n’est pas grande, car il s’agit de types bien connus, publiés dans IDR III/6. En revanche, nous remercions chaleureusement Mme Adriana Isac pour nous avoir permis d’utiliser toutes les pièces provenant du camp de Gilău, dont certaines inédites. Au début de 1997 des tuiles estampillées représentatives ont été envoyées au musée de Zalău en vue d’une exposition illustrant la vie militaire dans le nord de Dacie. Elles n’ont plus été restituées. Afin d’éviter des problèmes administratifs, on les a inclues dans le premier supplément, qui contient les inscriptions sur les briques et les tuiles du musée de Zalău. Le présent volume ne représente pas moins un catalogue du musée de Cluj.” (Prooemium)

„Imnele care împodobesc slujbele Bisericii Ortodoxe sunt creaţii ale unor Sfinţi Părinţi ai Bisericii, cei mai mulţi trăitori în partea bizantină a primului mileniu al creştinătăţii încă nedivizate. După un alt mileniu de istorie zbuciumată a Bisericii, până astăzi, imnele marilor colecţii liturgice ca Octoihul, Triodul, Penticostarul şi Mineiele păstrează nealterată amintirea unei perioade esenţiale pentru structurarea învăţăturii de credinţă. Este perioada Sinoadelor Ecumenice, a marilor personalităţi care au ilustrat secolele patristice şi care au lăsat o perenă creaţie, atât de expresie mai teoretică, dar şi imnografică.” Vasile Grăjdian

-

„The frontiers of the Roman Empire, over 5000 km long, stretch from the Atlantic coast of Scotland, along the Rhine and the Danube, also enclose the Banat region and Transylvania, then going down along the Oriental Carpathians to the Black Sea; from the southern coast of the Black Sea they continue towards the Near East until the Red Sea; then, in North Africa, they line the edge of the Sahara desert until the Atlantic coast of Morocco. Over this entire area, visible traces of fortifications, roads and settlements are still preserved, but numerous monuments still lay hidden underneath the earth. Despite the fact that the Roman frontiers crossed regions with different relief and climate, they constitute a whole in that they were designed to protect Roman territories. The research of these monuments and the preservation policy regarding them was and is unequal in the various presentday states on whose territory traces of the Roman frontier are to be found. Consequently, in the ‘80s of the 20th century, the idea of globally protecting the Roman frontiers, viewed as a unitary monument, was met. In 1987, Hadrian’s Wall in United Kingdom was declared a UNESCO monument. It was followed in 2005 by the German-Raetian sector, on which occasion the UNESCO committee decided to set up the ‘Frontiers of the Roman Empire’ site. (...)

This project through its complexity generated an interdisciplinary approach of the proposed subject stimulating such future attempts in the archaeological research field. By using the latest technical methods of non-destructive investigation the project did not damage the stratigraphy of the archaeological site obtaining instead a high amount of data otherwise time consuming judging from the archaeological excavations perspective contributing also to the preservation of the cultural heritage.” - Introduction

 

SOMMAIRE

Horea Poenar, A World to Win. But in Whose Image?


I. The Challenge of Community

Simon Harel, Face aux littératures des Premières Nations
Florin Poenaru, We, the People!: Community, Populism and the Crisis of Political Representation
Alex Cistelecan, Community Building in Post-historical Times
Vladimir Borțun, The EU is Naked: The Progressive Clothes of a Capitalist Project
Horea Poenar, Bad New World. The (Relative) Rebirth of the Commons
Călina Părău, Community and Togetherness after the Non-sharable
Alexandru Matei, De la métaphysique du « commun » au « comment vivre ensemble ». Jean-Luc Nancy et Roland Barthes sur la communauté
Aura Poenar, Reconstructing Communities. In Spite of all Machinery of Disimagination
Corin Braga, L’attaque contre l’individualité dans les antiutopies totalitaires modernes
Diana I. Santiago, Slaves and Slavery in the 19th Century Puerto Rican Literature
Laura T. Ilea, Inch’Allah : La honte et la « géographie de l’affect »
Emmanuela Pustan, On the Artistic Propensity of Pathology: Georges Didi-Huberman and the Invention of Hysteria


II. Communities at Work

Ioan Pop-Curșeu, Can Art (Re)build a Community? The Roşia Montană Case, between Past and Future
Ruxandra Cesereanu, Political Escapes from Prisons and Camps in the 20th Century – Antisystemic Mentalities
Marius Lazăr, What Can Be Seen. Documenting the Transition Between Telling and Showing
Carmen Borbély, Communities under Erasure in Seamus Deane’s Reading in the Dark
Petronia Popa Petrar, Written Communities: Imagining Connection in Virginia Woolf’s Novels
Alina Monica Toma, Dystopian Community in Lois Lowry’s Novel The Giver
Amalia Cotoi, Mircea Nedelciu’s Community of Tratament fabulatoriu
Rareș Moldovan, The State of Play: Geektopia in Ready Player One
Doru Pop, Deterritorialized Cinema, Dislocated Spaces and Disembodied Characters in Bogdan Mirică’s Câini
Mihaiela Ilea, Niche Structures in Television. Video Poetry – Visually Reading the Reality
Răzvan Cîmpean, Kaleidoscopic History. Visually Representing Community in Tarkovsky’s The Mirror
Cristina Popescu, The Woman as a Misfit in Michelangelo Antonioni’s Tetralogy
Cristina Diamant, Stranger(s’) Voices at Home. The Many Faces of Cillian Murphy as the Misfit
Iulia Rădac, The Posture of the Writer in a Teenager’s Book: Mircea Eliade’s Romanul Adolescentului Miop

Book Reviews