SOMMAIRE

Alexander Baumgarten, Le reste comme problème de la philosophie

I. Figurer le reste

Luigi Tassoni, La poetica delle somiglianze. Milo De Angelis dalle rovine del soggetto alle tracce del riconoscimento
Corin Braga, Le centre structurel et ses restes
Giovanni Rotiroti, Per una poetica e una politica dei resti a partire da Urmuz: il caso di Tristan Tzara, Eugène Ionesco, Paul Celan e Gherasim Luca
Antonio Patraș, The Anecdote in The History of Romanian Literature from Its Origins to the Present
Ligia Tudurachi, « Jouets », « boîtes », « reliques ». Fascination du petit chez Hortensia Papadat-Bengescu
George Alexandru Condrache, The Residual Forms in Contemporary Central European Literature. Two Case Studies: Bohumil Hrabal and Ádám Bodor


II. Le continent de la non-lecture

Horea Poenar, Glitches of the Archive: On the Relation Between Memory and the Commons
Catherine Gravet, Dépouiller des archives pour éditer des textes « résiduels » : le cas Alexis Curvers
Florin Oprescu & Monica Oprescu, Mateiu Caragiale – Through the Leftovers’ Glass. From the Journal to Ephemerides
Gabriela Glăvan, Communist Leftovers: The Forgotten Books of Gellu Naum
Eugen Radu Wohl, Ion D. Sîrbu’s Anthumous Works as (Re)valuable Residues
Levente T. Szabó, Dilettantism as a Moral Panic. Recovering a Forgotten Discourse of Hungarian Literary Modernization]
Corina Croitoru, Le résidu du résidu : ombres de la poésie roumaine de guerre
Roxana Patraș, When All That Rests Is Literature: Traces, Transcriptions and Remnants of Great Speeches
Arina Neagu, Une autre approche sur les mémoires roumains de prison : le caractère résiduel de « l’indicible concentrationnaire »
Barbara Miceli, How to Turn a Forgotten Figure of American History into a National and Gender Emblem: Joyce Carol Oates’s Treatment of Mary Jo Kopechne in Black Water


III. Identités en marge

Marie Vrinat-Nikolov, Les langues ignorées de l’espace littéraire bulgare
Annalisa Cosentino, La boemia altrove
Marius Popa, Le classicisme français dans la critique littéraire de la génération roumaine de 1848. Radiographies d’un « malentendu »
Lavinia Sabou, The Travel Accounts We Don’t Write About. Eastern European Ways of Mapping the World
Ruxandra Cesereanu, Societal Metabolism and “Excretion”: Towards a Typology of Marginals (The Fiction of Venedikt Yerofeyev, Alexander Zinoviev and Roberto Bolaño)


IV. Survivances

Monica Fekete, La rigenerazione del poema cavalleresco: da centro epico-narrativo a margine del moderno, da trionfo idealistico a spazio del romanzo contemporaneo
Laura Marin, Survivances du neutre
Márta Zabán, Residual Nationalism. The Nineteenth-Century Hungarian Folk Drama as a Reinterpretation of European Theatrical Nationalism. Pour une politique du résiduel en littérature
Ioana Bot, Gli esordi dimenticati della stilistica: Leo Spitzer, censore dei soldati italiani nei campi di prigionia della Prima Guerra Mondiale
Elena Crașovan, (Mis)readings of Contemporary Magical-Realist Fiction in the Context of Romania’s 2000 Literary Generation. The Case of Bogdan Popescu
Adriana Stan, Monuments of Literature, Scraps of Criticism


V. Entretiens: Ioana Bot, What’s Left? A Discussion on the Remains of Writing – and the Remains of Living – with Two European Authors

“Starting with the early 1970s Fântânele (Bistrița-Năsăud County) has been a well-known site in the archaeological literature referring to the Migration Period and Early Middle Ages in Transylvania. Although the excavations carried out on the hill called Dealul Popii or Dâmbul Popii by the research team lead by Ion Horaţiu Crişan have never been published exhaustively, the site was included in several synthesis works on the topic of the archaeological material from Transylvania belonging to the Migration Period, respectively to the 6th–7th centuries. The main goal of the present volume is to fill this gap by publishing all the known data regarding the mentioned discoveries based on the original documentation (written and drawn record) on one hand, and on the grave-goods identified with a few exceptions in the Institute of Archaeology and Art History, Cluj-Napoca, on the other hand.” (Foreword)

„Cartea este un model de tratare a unei vechi instituţii din Țara de Sus a Moldovei, până la ocuparea Bucovinei de către Habsburgi, în 1775. Perioada tratată cuprinde deceniile de final ale Evului Mediu şi aproape două secole din Epoca Modernă.” (Ioan-Aurel Pop)

„Vornicii de Câmpulung (Moldovenesc) au avut de îndeplinit un rol deosebit la fruntariile de vest ale Țării Moldovei. Din sursele istorice cercetate, reiese că aceştia erau răspunzători de paza hotarelor Moldovei. Tot ei au trebuit să întreţină relaţii politico-diplomatice şi economice bune cu juzii-primari din oraşul Bistriţa, pentru ca schimburile şi tranzacţiile economice dintre Transilvania şi Moldova să fie fructuoase şi lipsite de impedimente. Tot în sarcina vornicilor figura urmărirea, prinderea şi pedepsirea hoţilor care au activat la hotarul dintre Moldova şi Transilvania. Nu în ultimul rând, vornicii de Câmpulung, pentru a îndeplini atribuţiile cu care au fost investiţi de către domnie, au avut în subordinea lor un aparat administrativ complex, format din vameşi, namestnici, vatamani de sat, dieci, oameni buni şi bătrâni etc.” (din „Introducere”)